Sanna's articles on the Ravobet blog cover two subjects: the terms attached to bonuses – wagering requirements, game weighting and maximum bet – and the beliefs that steer gambling decisions.
In the bonus articles every amount is one the site publishes, and the wagering examples use the range the site itself states. No individual campaign's multiplier is quoted from memory: the exact terms are stated at the cashier with the campaign.
The articles on belief compare folk ideas with probability. The gambler's fallacy, hot and cold machines and lucky charms are worked through as figures – and the answer is the same each time: a draw has no memory.
Responsible gambling runs through the articles at a practical level: what to read in the terms before depositing, and when a bonus is better declined.
A losing streak does not bring a win closer, and no game is hot or cold. Four common beliefs and what probability says about each.
Explore more
The same €100 bonus can require €2,000 or €10,000 in stakes – the difference comes from one clause. How the wagering requirement is calculated before you deposit.
Explore more
Half a bankroll lost needs a hundred percent gain to return. A losing streak as figures – and where persistence genuinely belongs.
Explore moreThe terms attached to bonuses – wagering requirements, game weighting and maximum bet – and the beliefs that steer gambling decisions.
From the offers the site publishes. An individual campaign's wagering multiplier is not quoted in an article, because it is stated at the cashier with the campaign and changes along with it.
The gambler's fallacy, the idea of hot and cold machines, lucky charms, and the lesson of the Kalevala's heroes. Each is worked through using probability.
No. Every round is drawn separately and a random number generator has no memory of previous rounds. This mistake is known as the gambler's fallacy.
On this page and on the Ravobet blog, where the articles are listed in order of publication.
